Levels

[Lordangers]

Besides the ranks (pawn, private, colonel... etc)
It would be nice to have levels.

Which actually affect the game.
So like, if you are level 1 you would be less powerful than a level 4...

So that high ranked players or more experienced members would have a higher chance than a noob.

That way the game will change and will start being more addictive.
People usually get addicted to games they compare with others.
Games which they have advantages over others.

Levels would really make this game much better!

What do you all think?

[patriotsrock]

no, because elites already own, and that wouldn't make the game fun.
Also you DONT want it to be addictive, thats bad.

[Lordangers]

Addictive is a good sign.

A player would not want a game to be addictive.
But the game owners would, so more players would come and enjoy their game.


I have owned many elites...
And I am only a pawn. (was an hour ago)


Making levels would just make the game fun and would change a lot.
It would make more experienced members feel better and will probably get the noobs turning into 24/7 players which will get the game going.

Right now there is about 20 rooms at all times.
With "levels" there would be many more!

[vSkyzv]

I don't like levels because the higher levels will be able to own lower levels regardless of skill. For example, Assassinator will easily be able to own somebody even if that somebody is twice as skilled as he is (not implying there is anybody twice as skilled as Assassatinator).

[patriotsrock]

Addictive is a good sign.

A player would not want a game to be addictive.
But the game owners would, so more players would come and enjoy their game.


I have owned many elites...
And I am only a pawn. (was an hour ago)


Making levels would just make the game fun and would change a lot.
It would make more experienced members feel better and will probably get the noobs turning into 24/7 players which will get the game going.

Right now there is about 20 rooms at all times.
With "levels" there would be many more!
yes but, people like the game how it is and would not like a change.
(its not called a "pawn" its called a "nOOb")

[Lordangers]

Levels could also be like for every level you have you gain another KC when you enter a room instead of having 0.

Levels could be like:

Level 1= 10 kills

Level 2= 50 kills

...


Patriot, so you are just going to decline every single suggestion someone posts? Because you like the game as it is and you don't want it changed?

Sounds pretty pathetic.

The game must improve.
Some people might like it more, some people will like it less.


Levels will boost up the outcome of this game big time.

[vSkyzv]

Levels could also be like for every level you have you gain another KC when you enter a room instead of having 0.

Levels could be like:

Level 1= 10 kills

Level 2= 50 kills

...


Patriot, so you are just going to decline every single suggestion someone posts? Because you like the game as it is and you don't want it changed?

Sounds pretty pathetic.

The game must improve.
Some people might like it more, some people will like it less.


Levels will boost up the outcome of this game big time.
It wouldn't be fun. It would just let cocky high levels who suck own better skilled players with little effort. Besides, it will promote guest farming.

[Lordangers]

So what's the point having ranks if it doesn't change anything?

There isn't any bonuses for ranks...

[patriotsrock]

Levels could also be like for every level you have you gain another KC when you enter a room instead of having 0.

Levels could be like:

Level 1= 10 kills

Level 2= 50 kills

...


Patriot, so you are just going to decline every single suggestion someone posts? Because you like the game as it is and you don't want it changed?

Sounds pretty pathetic.

The game must improve.
Some people might like it more, some people will like it less.


Levels will boost up the outcome of this game big time.
ctf everyone wants. but they dont add it, they would never add this.
and having a higher rank, people respect you better and if you are very good you become elite.

[Eiliosdraye]

This suggestion is horrible.


See the high ranks(about 40% of the time) are more skilled then people rank star and below.


So, those 40% are the ones who play real games. And those 40% also coincidentally have good skills. And suppose they get level bonuses, you have no chance of beating them as a noob, because they have the level advantage AND more skill.


See what i'm saying?


ALSO, stop picking on patriot. This is a bad suggestion. All the good players realise that they will overpower the noobs even more if this suggestion is made.


We want a balance. NOT guest farming. If this suggestion is made, people will guest farm nonstop and use their level to overpower people.

[xxXDominoXxx]

Sounds like Pawngame/Magestorm combination.

[vSkyzv]

So what's the point having ranks if it doesn't change anything?

There isn't any bonuses for ranks...

The purpose of ranks is for the sake of having a score tracking system. Nobody said we need bonuses.