View Full Version : 4 servers
chipmunking
12-31-2007, 11:38 AM
I think pawn should be split into 4 servers to give noobs a chance For example:
Server 1- Noobs
Server 2- Ametuer(srry spelling)
Server 3- Pros
Server 4- Free(anyone can come)
RogerTheRabbit
12-31-2007, 11:58 AM
That would never be useful. Elites could goto the n00b room and vise versa. A better idea would be to have multiple servers (free for all).
clone309969103
12-31-2007, 12:06 PM
ya that would be help ful so we battle people not higher or lower then us
devilmayroy
12-31-2007, 01:01 PM
That would never be useful. Elites could goto the n00b room and vise versa. A better idea would be to have multiple servers (free for all).
the n00b severes would be accesibal to n00bs tho maybe?
RogerTheRabbit
12-31-2007, 01:05 PM
What about those who make new accounts and already have high ranks? They would go through the "n00bs" like their guests.
vSkyzv
12-31-2007, 10:25 PM
Why don't we keep it the way it is.
DaSniped
12-31-2007, 10:46 PM
I think pawn should be split into 4 servers to give noobs a chance For example:
Server 1- Noobs
Server 2- Ametuer(srry spelling)
Server 3- Pros
Server 4- Free(anyone can come)
Noobs server could be for Pacifier rank to 4th rank Ametuer could be 5th rank - 8th rank Pros 8th rank - to last rank.
TopHatMan
12-31-2007, 10:48 PM
4 servers for EVERYBODY would rock cause there would be hardly any lag
netto
12-31-2007, 10:49 PM
3 things: 1.wouldnt more servers cause lag or cost a lot. 2. instead of an ametur server it could be an intermidate server. 3.everyone would be in the free server.
TopHatMan
12-31-2007, 11:04 PM
they would cost alot, not cause lag
Pooshonmyshoos
12-31-2007, 11:24 PM
That would never be useful. Elites could goto the n00b room and vise versa.
True that, I hate the people who play gunbound 24/7 and have 200X more armor than you and come and own you just because they have better armor.
TopHatMan
12-31-2007, 11:32 PM
well gunbound sucks anyways :confused:
Eiliosdraye
01-01-2008, 01:28 AM
Bad idea. See the thing is pawn server is kind of shaky, so imagine 4 servers. Not to mention it's like 100 dollars a month for 1 server, so 4 servers?
You get the picture? just too hard to maintain.
SketchZ
01-01-2008, 01:30 AM
We go t two servers...
acting as one :)
so if we just had 3 servers acting as one.... it'd be bettter / less laggy
3 is the lucky charm. :)
TopHatMan
01-01-2008, 01:39 AM
We go t two servers...
acting as one :)
so if we just had 3 servers acting as one.... it'd be bettter / less laggy
3 is the lucky charm. :)
until we get like 1 mill accounts
SketchZ
01-01-2008, 01:41 AM
The more the merrier?
WolfHowlz
01-01-2008, 01:44 AM
Four is too much...3..yes I agree with sketchz. BTW sketchz...I want my brain back :P
SketchZ
01-01-2008, 01:47 AM
NEver!! I FED IT TO JEDI!!! :)
Puffer
01-01-2008, 01:53 AM
It is a good idea. But its better to just have a seprate server from the users and guests.
SketchZ
01-01-2008, 01:56 AM
That, I know, that way regular users stop feeding off of them.
I dont' like the fact they do that, because the new users playing as guests would fear playing because they'd think they suck as soon as they get killed by a high ranker. :)
Puffer
01-01-2008, 02:01 AM
That, I know, that way regular users stop feeding off of them.
I dont' like the fact they do that, because the new users playing as guests would fear playing because they'd think they suck as soon as they get killed by a high ranker. :)
All Elites play guests now. I used to play alot of them now I dont even really play. But I have skillz.
MAKE SURE TO HARVEST THE NOOB WHEN ITS RIPE. NOT WHEN ITS A GUEST!
Remember that kids:rolleyes:
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.