PA Booting

[NetNerd101]

Now before you post, please hear me out. I know that PA's have enough power as it is, but no one like a hacker, spammer, flamer etc. So this is where my idea comes in. When a moderator is not on or is busy, a PA can ban a user for 24 hours or less. This will get rid of them, and you will be able to enjoy the rest of you're day. If a PA is abusing his/her power then you will be able to talk to a moderator about it, but only with proof. Please post if you agree or dis-agree. Thank you for you're time. That is all.




-Discuss.

[Chickletman]

They have plenty of power already, they aren't mods dude >_>

[Dax]

It was huge deal when they got the ability to kick. Banning is out of the question.

[Timeline]

pa's =/= mods

edit: for those inept at whatever reference I just made, I was saying pa's are not mods.

[Dylan]

PA's could boot before hamo destroyed it.


:|

Well, and me and smoothcopycat,who were not PA.

[NetNerd101]

pa's =/= mods

Not exactly, PA's would only be able to ban users for 24 hours or less. This will just get rid of them for a day, and then PA's would report every ban/kick in the PA section to make sure they are not abusing powers.

[PiNGPaWN]

Lol timeline :)
----------------
I would have to disagree with you.
kicking is good enough.

[Twilly]

PA's could boot before hamo destroyed it.


:|

Well, and me and smoothcopycat,who were not PA.

I was the original non-PA chossen one, you just got it from IRC.

Anyhow. No, tis have enough power.

[mondo909]

PA's are not mods. there job is to awnser peoples questions

EDIT:saw your list,
put me under "do not agree"

[NetNerd101]

I was the original non-PA chossen one, you just got it from IRC.

Anyhow. No, tis have enough power.

Come on, this would help so much. This would get rid of hackers easily. Everyone in chat is always saying that their is a hacker, but there is no way to get proof. If a PA saw that all he would have to do is go in the room, and if there really is a hacker. BAM! Banned. 1 less hacker.

[Timeline]

then BAM 24 hours later the hacker is back.

[mondo909]

1 less hacker.
for a day..
whats that going to do :rolleyes:

[DS]

PA's don't need to be able to ban. Banning shouldn't be a privilege for users. To get rid of hackers, you have to IP ban them.

[NetNerd101]

then BAM 24 hours later the hacker is back.

for a day..
whats that going to do :rolleyes:

Like I said every kick/ban would be submitted in the PA section Title: Hacker, spammer, flaming, etc. A mod would see it then a permie. Simple as that 1 less hacker.

[mondo909]

even if the ban is from a trusted user, i dought a mod would ban without proof

[NetNerd101]

even if the ban is from a trusted user, i dought a mod would ban without proof

What would be the point of a ban if it wasn't legitimate? Most PA's wouldn't lie.

[mondo909]

What would be the point of a ban if it wasn't legitimate? Most PA's wouldn't lie.


but there is still NO proof... :rolleyes:

[NetNerd101]

but there is still NO proof... :rolleyes:

PA must screen shot the proof of ban. Better?

[mondo909]

PA must screen shot the proof of ban. Better?

the proof of them banning the "hacker"
or the proof of them hacking?

[NetNerd101]

the proof of them banning the "hacker"
or the proof of them hacking?

Proof of them hacking. Ex: Team kill, Kills like the whole team more than once (2 screen shots) etc.

[Timeline]

we had to do that in order to kick hackers anyway.

[NetNerd101]

we had to do that in order to kick hackers anyway.

Tell me when you do that how long does it take for the hacker to get banned? This will get rid of the hacker instantly, and then a moderator will see the proof = permie.

[DS]

Proof of them hacking. Ex: Team kill, Kills like the whole team more than once (2 screen shots) etc.
There's a thread for that in the PA section. Once they post the screenshot there, we ban. So there's no need for them to ban.

[NetNerd101]

There's a thread for that in the PA section. Once they post the screenshot there, we ban. So there's no need for them to ban.

It usually takes a moderator a day or two, to see it. My idea gets rid of the hacker instantly, and then later permied.

Edit: Plus that is just hacking. What about the spammers and flamers?

[DS]

It usually takes a moderator a day or two, to see it. My idea gets rid of the hacker instantly, and then later permied.

Edit: Plus that is just hacking. What about the spammers and flamers?
It doesn't take a day or two for us to ban them. We check it as much as we can. Also, it's highly unlikely to get rid of a hacker without an IP ban.

[NetNerd101]

It doesn't take a day or two for us to ban them. We check it as much as we can. Also, it's highly unlikely to get rid of a hacker without an IP ban.

Oh, I see. Well in that case, lock thread. I have gotten my answer.