Musle345
05-29-2009, 07:51 PM
OK. Im gonna post some absolute BS, slightly humourous links to pages in this thread.
I'll gonna keep them coming. You can add your own if you want.
OK.
Heres my first One.
http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/lees-lolita-ok/2006/10/04/1159641365538.html
Its old OK, 2006. But is so screwed up, its a advertisment controvsery about Lolita!
And guess what the Aussie Ad board said?
"The board also (notes) that consumption of this style of lollipop is now common amongst people over 18."
Wow! So it isnt Lolita anymore? That over18 chick looks like, 13!
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2008/12/08/1228584707575.html
Simpsons Child porn? Weve seen heaps of it on our normal websites, the creators of these fake cartoons in the ads fogot that the Simpsons where a family with kids, or incest isnt a problem, But getta load of this!
He drew cartoons of Bart, Lisa and Maggie and stored them on his PC.
Thats right, Maggie, the baby? WHAT THE ******* HELL IS WRONG WITH THIS GUY?
I think naming and shame is enough, but he gotta 3000 dollar fine and 2 years of Good Behaviour, he probaly shoulda gone to the Looney ward instead, but I agree with his defense.
McEwan appealed against the decision, arguing that fictional cartoon characters could not be considered people as they "plainly and deliberately" departed from the human form.
OK. Its animal porn, alien porn, yellow blob porn? WHAT THE HELL?
The judge agreed kinda...
But Justice Adams agreed with the magistrate. He found that, while The Simpsons characters had hands with four fingers and their faces were "markedly and deliberately different to those of any possible human being", the mere fact that they were not realistic representations of human beings did not mean that they could not be considered people.
The Simpsons are yellow matey, when people are yellow, they are dead. Yeah, dead people having sex is creepy, But It wouldnt turn anyone on, so it isnt porn...
I just call the Simpsons "yellow scumbags that gimme a ocansonial laugh", latin name Simpsonous Repeataous....
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_3q-8XBLTy_Y/ST6yU6wCnMI/AAAAAAAAAJQ/cpaJ-Dz--DI/s320/bart.jpg
No, that isnt my own Drawing, that is a screenie from The Simpsons Movie.
And that was rated PG. Your Honour, your missing the big point here, milllions of people have Seen this...
With a big **** like that, no wonder why that guy drew Bart naked! Flanders, dont eat that chip!
I'll gonna keep them coming. You can add your own if you want.
OK.
Heres my first One.
http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/lees-lolita-ok/2006/10/04/1159641365538.html
Its old OK, 2006. But is so screwed up, its a advertisment controvsery about Lolita!
And guess what the Aussie Ad board said?
"The board also (notes) that consumption of this style of lollipop is now common amongst people over 18."
Wow! So it isnt Lolita anymore? That over18 chick looks like, 13!
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2008/12/08/1228584707575.html
Simpsons Child porn? Weve seen heaps of it on our normal websites, the creators of these fake cartoons in the ads fogot that the Simpsons where a family with kids, or incest isnt a problem, But getta load of this!
He drew cartoons of Bart, Lisa and Maggie and stored them on his PC.
Thats right, Maggie, the baby? WHAT THE ******* HELL IS WRONG WITH THIS GUY?
I think naming and shame is enough, but he gotta 3000 dollar fine and 2 years of Good Behaviour, he probaly shoulda gone to the Looney ward instead, but I agree with his defense.
McEwan appealed against the decision, arguing that fictional cartoon characters could not be considered people as they "plainly and deliberately" departed from the human form.
OK. Its animal porn, alien porn, yellow blob porn? WHAT THE HELL?
The judge agreed kinda...
But Justice Adams agreed with the magistrate. He found that, while The Simpsons characters had hands with four fingers and their faces were "markedly and deliberately different to those of any possible human being", the mere fact that they were not realistic representations of human beings did not mean that they could not be considered people.
The Simpsons are yellow matey, when people are yellow, they are dead. Yeah, dead people having sex is creepy, But It wouldnt turn anyone on, so it isnt porn...
I just call the Simpsons "yellow scumbags that gimme a ocansonial laugh", latin name Simpsonous Repeataous....
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_3q-8XBLTy_Y/ST6yU6wCnMI/AAAAAAAAAJQ/cpaJ-Dz--DI/s320/bart.jpg
No, that isnt my own Drawing, that is a screenie from The Simpsons Movie.
And that was rated PG. Your Honour, your missing the big point here, milllions of people have Seen this...
With a big **** like that, no wonder why that guy drew Bart naked! Flanders, dont eat that chip!