PDA

View Full Version : IDEA Lower Clan Requirements


Calisniper13
03-23-2009, 11:29 PM
100,000 points is a bunch of BS!!oneone


Make it moar lower plz?


Srsly.


Discuss.

Jmoney
03-23-2009, 11:59 PM
I am assuming you mean for PT clans.
The reason I think it is that high is because before the reset, there were a lot of inactive clans that noobs made just to be in a clan.

Ryuk
03-24-2009, 01:12 AM
I am assuming you mean for PT clans.
The reason I think it is that high is because before the reset, there were a lot of inactive clans that noobs made just to be in a clan.

That's exactly the reason, there was an extreme overflow of clans...

Cali, 100,000 isn't that much, it just takes a while. If you have a life(I'll directing this to you, betsy :P), it might take, oh, 2 months tops.

Dax
03-24-2009, 01:25 AM
Like Jmoney said, it is that high for a reason. It shouldn't take anyone who has any business making a clan 2 months to get 100,000. Maybe 1 month tops.

Cali, you know polls are required, T_T

Betsinator
03-24-2009, 12:44 PM
That's exactly the reason, there was an extreme overflow of clans...

Cali, 100,000 isn't that much, it just takes a while. If you have a life(I'll directing this to you, betsy :P), it might take, oh, 2 months tops.

lol i had the week of homealone why not get my score up
but no do not lower it

WolfHowlz
03-24-2009, 12:58 PM
No 100,000 is good. Just a lot of padding...I mean..capturing flags with other people in the game..>_>

HvyGnnr
03-24-2009, 06:59 PM
i think it should be lowere to like 10,000. i dont see the problem with having too many clans though. i think before it is registered in the list, it must have 10 members. something like that. im sure its possible to limit inactive clans and still lower the requirement. i think a new thread should be made with a poll, or a poll added to follow Sharpyy's rules

Calisniper13
03-24-2009, 08:52 PM
You guys suack except the one who suggested lowering it 10,000.


>:O

Added your fapping poll

Ryuk
03-24-2009, 09:12 PM
http://www.playkon.com/uploads/2008/02/No-U.jpg

SatanicWarLord
03-24-2009, 09:17 PM
yes....i want the requirement to be lower
i actuallly got 100k
i was so happy!!!!
and then the reset happened...i was online when it happened....:(

so i support u 100%

Tobyman
03-24-2009, 09:59 PM
I think its reasonable, because noobs in pt will start creating stupid clans and no one joins , then, the clan ranks wil be over flooded.

Calisniper13
03-25-2009, 12:54 PM
Moar votes for Yes

CubeX
03-25-2009, 01:52 PM
I vote yes, Clan requirements need going down.

HvyGnnr
03-25-2009, 06:46 PM
this really does need to happen. clans dont have to be about being the best or the top, just to be for grouping with your friends and stuff. btw thanks calisniper, im the one who suggested 10,000

MORE VOTES FOR YES!!!

shooter65
03-26-2009, 12:47 AM
Lower it NAO! 100,000 is too much. Cali is win PT clan 100,000 is fail. <_<

AeroNinja
03-26-2009, 02:26 AM
Just a lot of padding...I mean..capturing flags with other people in the game..>_>
Rofl, or you could get some skill and actually get 100,000 without cheating.
But i mean PMR im sorry if you read this but a k/d of 6.05 O_O
Heavy Camper is also another way to cheat or as some refer to it as PMR'ing.

Sairivon
03-26-2009, 01:18 PM
...Strongly Disagree...

...100K is fair. Too many clans came about when the cap was low. The point of a clan is to gather members/friends, have fun, and wage war against others to show who reigns supreme...This also shows that you had the skill,time, etc. to show that you DESERVE that clan, and that you'll keep up with it 'till the day you retire from PT...

Riswald
03-26-2009, 03:08 PM
Rofl, or you could get some skill and actually get 100,000 without cheating.
But i mean PMR im sorry if you read this but a k/d of 6.05 O_O
Heavy Camper is also another way to cheat or as some refer to it as PMR'ing.

Alright thats dumb... PMR DOES NOT CHEAT!.... do not put down what you do not understand. PMR has skills that you will never have in your whole LIFE!

P.S 100k is very reasonable if you have 100k then it shows that you will be active and keep the clan active instead of having it for a day then saying i dont like this game

Calisniper13
03-26-2009, 06:42 PM
100,000 points is such crap.


Who has that kind of time?

By then, people are already in a clan

This just makes clans a waste if no one has the ability to make them.

JoKeR
03-26-2009, 06:50 PM
It was 10,000 points back then to make a clan and now they made it bigger

Sairivon
03-26-2009, 11:27 PM
100,000 points is such crap.


Who has that kind of time?

By then, people are already in a clan

This just makes clans a waste if no one has the ability to make them.

An attempt to end this SGST, here's major reason for 100K requirement:

...Reason why its so high is b/c people kept making clans and ditching them by leaving the game and using another profile. By making a higher requirement, people must stay in PT for a LONG time to acquire the clans, therefore keeping those stupid non-active ones away...

If you want to make a clan, be prepared for the long run, payoff is worth it.
If your staying in PT for a short time, then join one and suck up to the leader to they give u mod or lead position when they retire.

Which option will you choose?..

Marine22
03-27-2009, 12:04 AM
100,000 points is a bunch of BS!!oneone


Make it moar lower plz?


Srsly.


Discuss.

Srsly.
cali don't even ask this question
you are staying in PG forever
GTFO teh pt

Calisniper13
03-27-2009, 07:06 PM
Eliminate clans with less than 5 people.


Then you can add the 10,000 rule.

Or maybe a creator cannot leave the clan without disbanding it.

Calisniper13
04-18-2009, 10:22 PM
Bumporz. Moar yes votes pl0x.

VisionsEdge
04-18-2009, 10:30 PM
Have you ever thought they made it to see if your active or not. Whotf would want a clan with some nooby clanmaster who just played so he could become a great headmaster adn say that he can pwn all of them. And then quit a day later...

That is why it's 100,000. I do not like this idea at all...

You want to be a clan master? WORK FOR IT! Don't ASK FOR IT!

Pook
04-18-2009, 10:49 PM
That's exactly the reason, there was an extreme overflow of clans...

Cali, 100,000 isn't that much, it just takes a while. If you have a life(I'll directing this to you, betsy :P), it might take, oh, 2 months tops.


Since the reset I've only reached 30k. I can get it sooner or later. :)

I say yes, reduce it to 69,000. Seems reasonable.

Calisniper13
04-18-2009, 10:54 PM
Have you ever thought they made it to see if your active or not. Whotf would want a clan with some nooby clanmaster who just played so he could become a great headmaster adn say that he can pwn all of them. And then quit a day later...

You want to be a clan master? WORK FOR IT! Don't ASK FOR IT!

Why would being "active" matter? There are many ways to deal with that problem. There are many nooby clanmasters now with 100k points required. Lowering it will help increase clan activity and with the addition of clan wars, will actually have meaning now.

I am at 20k points so far. I am working for it, but 100k is still way too much. Lower it a tad. By half maybe?

50k is more reasonable.

Enemy
04-19-2009, 12:08 AM
I am assuming you mean for PT clans.
The reason I think it is that high is because before the reset, there were a lot of inactive clans that noobs made just to be in a clan.

Before the recent reset, there had been an update that made the clan requirements 100K. But BEFORE that update, the Score requirement was at 5,000 Points. As J said many, many noobs made clans just because it made them feel....."Cool and Important"...i guess you could say.

Calisniper13
04-19-2009, 06:12 PM
Before the recent reset, there had been an update that made the clan requirements 100K. But BEFORE that update, the Score requirement was at 5,000 Points. As J said many, many noobs made clans just because it made them feel....."Cool and Important"...i guess you could say.

Eliminate clans with less than 5 people.


Then you can add the 10,000 rule.

Or maybe a creator cannot leave the clan without disbanding it.


I have addressed this so called problem