View Full Version : PT and PG have different "tournament" and "clan" threads
Balddude
03-18-2009, 05:32 AM
Well, I suggest that the PT and PG community should have different sections for posting their tournament and clan threads. Right now, you always have no idea which clan or tournament is for which game.
Opinions?
Parma
03-18-2009, 06:23 AM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eh, no? Look PT don't do many tournaments but as for clan threads we are much more well official about it. I wouldn't worry this is actually the best way for a clan to run on both games.. CIA is the only clan to do it successfully for some time but ultimately died.... Look as for the forums at the moment, I wouldn't worry about it as of yet.
Balddude
03-18-2009, 06:31 AM
Double post. You need to get use to the thread lag here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eh, no? Look PT don't do many tournaments but as for clan threads we are much more well official about it. I wouldn't worry this is actually the best way for a clan to run on both games.. CIA is the only clan to do it successfully for some time but ultimately died.... Look as for the forums at the moment, I wouldn't worry about it as of yet.
Yeah, but now, there is a reason to actually conduct tournaments in Pawn Tactics---Credits. We can use credits to act as rewards for the winners, so people will be more motivated to actually complete tournaments.
I am just saying, sooner or later, the seperate clans in PT and PG all compacted in one section is going to get messy. We should resolve this problem as fast as possible.
Eh, having PT and PG stuff in the same section is fine. I see more clans becoming PT and PG. That being said PT has a more advanced clan system then PG. I would like to see a clan system similar to it inacted in PG, however that is unlikely to happen.
Please include a poll.
Balddude
03-18-2009, 01:04 PM
Eh, having PT and PG stuff in the same section is fine. I see more clans becoming PT and PG. That being said PT has a more advanced clan system then PG. I would like to see a clan system similar to it inacted in PG, however that is unlikely to happen.
Please include a poll.
Well, at least the clan section should be separated into 3 different parts. One for Pawn Tactics, one for Pawn Game, and one for a merge. The tournament section should have 2 different parts, one for Pawn Tactics and one for Pawn Game. This way, it will be more organized than the current situation.
I will add a poll if you teach me how to. I am not sure of the editing controls yet.
Eh, having PT and PG stuff in the same section is fine. I see more clans becoming PT and PG. That being said PT has a more advanced clan system then PG. I would like to see a clan system similar to it inacted in PG, however that is unlikely to happen.
Please include a poll.
Win suggestion is win, I tried suggesting that PG use a similar clan system as well, but it hasn't really gained universal support.
Balddude
03-19-2009, 06:18 AM
Win suggestion is win, I tried suggesting that PG use a similar clan system as well, but it hasn't really gained universal support.
Well, if PG were to have the same clan system, the 2 games would be, well, too similar. The gameplay and ranks are already almost the same, if the clan system were to be replicated in PG too, the 2 games would almost lose their individual originality.
poe101591
03-19-2009, 09:36 AM
Well, if PG were to have the same clan system, the 2 games would be, well, too similar. The gameplay and ranks are already almost the same, if the clan system were to be replicated in PG too, the 2 games would almost lose their individual originality.
the ranks aren't the same :\
but I support the games having separate Tournament section, it will get confusing if it is never clear which game the tournament is on.
Betsinator
03-19-2009, 10:08 AM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eh, no? Look PT don't do many tournaments but as for clan threads we are much more well official about it. I wouldn't worry this is actually the best way for a clan to run on both games.. CIA is the only clan to do it successfully for some time but ultimately died.... Look as for the forums at the moment, I wouldn't worry about it as of yet.
this is true.
but i see more clans being like CIA and being in both games 2
Balddude
03-20-2009, 02:12 AM
this is true.
but i see more clans being like CIA and being in both games 2
Well, you guys don't seem to understand. Back then, many of the PT tournaments which were not completed were due to the fact that no one wanted participate, which was in turn due to the fact that there were no real prizes for the winners. But now, with the addition of credits in the forum system, there is a reason to compete in tournaments. You guys will see soon, very soon there will be a rather large amount of PT tournaments being help.
Also, when a few dozen people get the 100,000 mark in points, the amount of clans being made everyday will be immense. The confusion in both the tournament and clan sections will be very confusing.
superstition
03-20-2009, 05:34 AM
I think UltimateRecon hit this one dead center. PT and PG must have seperate places to discuss clans. Having two forums does not make it impossible to have a dual game clan.
I see this as necessary as ketchup on french fries.
Itches
03-20-2009, 05:36 AM
As far as for the clan threads good idea :) and maybe have diffent guide sections for the pt guides and pg guides.
Balddude
03-20-2009, 05:37 AM
I think UltimateRecon hit this one dead center. PT and PG must have seperate places to discuss clans. Having two forums does not make it impossible to have a dual game clan.
I see this as necessary as ketchup on french fries.
Ketchup on fries? I hate ketchup on fries...
You are one of the only people who get this. Well, I understand how others feel, this is truly not necessary, but it will reduce a lot of hassle and confusion over issues such as figuring out which tournament or clan is for PT or PG.
UnknownServer
03-20-2009, 05:46 AM
I dont think we need two different places for clan and tournament threads for PT and PG. As it has already been said there isnt much tournaments im either PG or PT and for clans theres nearly Zero clans who have both games running sucessfully. Its an idea to think about in the future but for now we dont need it. Re-Adress it in about 6 months mayb when PT settles down and clans start up and running :)
Calmador
03-20-2009, 05:51 AM
Well, I suggest that the PT and PG community should have different sections for posting their tournament and clan threads. Right now, you always have no idea which clan or tournament is for which game.
Opinions?
Maybe, if people can't adapt to it and it becomes a problem, sure but if people can manage seeing which is which then no.
Good Suggestion but idk
FrozenFlamez
03-20-2009, 05:52 AM
Yea. I think the last PT forum is so much nicer with that background and so MUCH MORE NON- LAGGIER.
Freak. :X
Balddude
03-20-2009, 06:07 AM
Yea. I think the last PT forum is so much nicer with that background and so MUCH MORE NON- LAGGIER.
Freak. :X
This was not even the point of my thread...
@MrShot11:
Well, it is always better to make some improvements earlier. If this were to happen when the situation really does get confusing, many people would be complaining and stuff like that. It would be better to resolve this issue as quickly as fast as possible.
Spongebob
03-20-2009, 09:07 AM
Tournaments? Clan?
PG has clans?
Balddude
03-20-2009, 09:13 AM
Tournaments? Clan?
PG has clans?
Yeah, some PG people take the initiative to make their own clans. It is sort of their private group, though there is no real comprehensive clan system in their game. But yeah, there are clans in PG.
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.